Jensen v. Schwartz’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1988
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grandin v. Gardiner · Buman v. Sturn · McDonald v. Abraham · Crombie v. Little · Bartell v. Morken
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An attack on a former judgment, in a subsequent action, constitutes a collateral attack upon such prior judgment of the court duly entered. Such an attack is ineffective unless the record of the original action shows that the court had no jurisdiction. " [Emphasis provided.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The judgment rendered by a court of general jurisdiction having jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter imports absolute verity as long as it stands.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heggen v. Marentette
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.