90 Ohio App. 3d 413 - Moore v. Jock’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 59 Ohio App. 3d 3 - Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co. · First Hudson Dev. Assoc. v. Hudson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In that event, if the judgment is appealed and affirmed, no interest would accrue during the time of the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“estopping [her] from claiming interest, such as bad faith or want of diligence in prosecution of the appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in the absence of a tender by the judgment debtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.