Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 386

Prentice v. Prentice

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1914

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1914-03-03

<p>Error to Circuff Court of Portage county.</p>

Decided 1914-03-03

¶1Judgment of the circuit court reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error. See journal entry.

¶2This court finds that the said circuit court erred in its finding and decree that the claims of the said Elmer E. Prentice, Administrator, and Anna M. Carpenter, Administratrix, were each of them a lien on the premises of the plaintiff in error which were described in the answers and cross-petitions of the said defendants in error. Coming now to render the judgment that the said circuit court should have rendered, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the -answers and cross-petitions of the said Elmer E. Prentice, Administrator, and Anna M. Carpenter, Administratrix, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed.

¶3It is further ordered that the plaintiff in error recover of the said defendants in error her costs herein and in the courts below.

¶4And this cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
/90/ohiost(ns)/386 · .json · Public domain