Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 OHIOST3D 460 - State v. Treesh

State v. Treesh’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1,642
cited by 1,642 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1,633 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,642 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Conway (2006), State v. LaMar (2002)

4 federal appellate · 1,633 state decisions

7270200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley

Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Jackson v. Virginia · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,642 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, counsel's decision whether to call a witness falls within the rubric of trial strategy and will not be second-guessed by a reviewing court.”
    35 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the evidence unless we find that reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion reached by the trier of fact.”
    35 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'[t]he relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.