Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 OHIOST3D 47 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

484
cited by 484 later decisions
8
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

482 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 484 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Farris (2006), Commonwealth v. Washington (2007)

482 state decisions

2160200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 484 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle, pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to conduct a search.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable ground for belief of guilt.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.