Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Okla. 59 - Rust v. Gillespie

Rust v. Gillespie’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2003

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

40192319301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jefferson v. Winkler · State Ex Rel. Haskell v. Huston · McCoy v. McCoy · American Ass'n v. Innis · Bartle v. Nutt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “applie[s] not only to the participants in the transaction, but to their heirs, and to all parties claiming under or through either of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.