90 Okla. Crim. 141 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1953
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 83 Okla. Crim. 392 - Smith v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 179 - Shimley v. State · 82 Okla. Crim. 243 - Dooley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Criminal Court of Appeals has the power to modify a judgment by reduction of the sentence but this power will be exercised only where it is apparent that an injustice has been done, it cannot be arbitrarily exercised.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.