90 Okla. Crim. 415 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2016
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Owens v. Commonwealth · 1 Okla. Crim. 358 - Price v. State · 86 Okla. Crim. 308 - Farmer v. State · 10 Okla. Crim. 417 - Harris v. State · 8 Okla. Crim. 209 - McDaniel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]uch an instruction has been condemned in this jurisdiction from territorial days to the present time.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage““A review of the authorities discloses that there have been a number of cases where this court gave an instruction covering reasonable doubt, and where the case was not reversed for that reason. In a number of instances this court approved the actual instruction defining reasonable doubt. See opinions by Judges Owen, Furman, Armstrong and Matson, respectively, and being: Chandler v. State, 3 Okl.Cr. 254 , 105 P. 375 , 107 P. 735 ; McDaniel v. State, 8 Okl.Cr. 209 , 127 P. 358 ; Scribner v. State, 11 Okl.Cr. 189 , 144 P. 626 , and Burns v. State, supra [ 22 Okl.Cr. 151 , 210 P. 302 ].””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lippoldt v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.