Larson v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2022
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Turner v. Safley · Sandin v. Conner · Hewitt v. Helms · Wisconsin v. Yoder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[als long as the conditions or degree of confinement to which the prisoner is subjected is within the sentence imposed upon him and is not otherwise violative of the Constitution, the Due Process Clause does not in itself subject an inmate's treatment by prison authorities to judicial oversight.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The guarantee of due process does not provide ... a right to avoid segregation from the general prison population.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“would seriously hamper their ability to anticipate security problems and to adopt innovative solutions to the intractable problems of prison administration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillip v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.