Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 P.3d 156 - State v. Blank

State v. Blank’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Mincey v. Arizona · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Winston v. Lee · Crystal Fergusons v. City of Charleston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person who operates or drives a motor vehicle in this state ... shall be considered to have given consent”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the context of the facts presented in this case, we choose to construe subsection.031(g) to incorporate, in addition to the statutory requirements, the exigent circumstances requirements discussed in Schmerber [v. State, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in context of warrantless searches for breath or blood in accident cases involving death or serious physical injury when probable cause to search exists and the search falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.