Wellington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 1995
most recently cited
1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police · In re Strauss · In the Matter of Morris Strauss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The affidavits in the cases before us are but conclusory in language. If we were to follow the Kirkland holding and to align ourselves with state jurisdictions such as New York which also follow Kirkland, it would be difficult to affirm the circuit court, at least on the basis of the affidavits alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall, on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under the Constitution each State was left with full control over its criminal procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Michigan v. Doran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.