90 So. 3d 122 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Doyle v. Ohio · Johnson v. California · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 650 So. 2d 1289 - MacK v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent , preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the defendant must make out a pri-ma facie case by showing that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose; (2) once the defendant has made out a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the State to explain adequately the racial exclusion by offering permissible, race-neutral justifications for the strikes; and (3)if a race-neutral explanation is tendered, the trial court must then decide whether the opponent of the strike has proved purposeful racial discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the mere mention of a defendant's refusal to give a statement does not, in all instances, require reversal. Instead, we review such comments on an individual basis. The proper test for determining if a comment on a defendant's post- Miranda silence amounts to reversible error is whether the natural and probable effect of the statement is to create an unjust prejudice against the accused resulting in a decision influenced by prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.