Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

90 S.W.3d 547

Kirby v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-11-19

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2015

12 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant, Esten Kirby, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea counsel’s erroneous advice and lack of advice induced him to plead guilty unknowingly and involuntarily.

¶3Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/90/sw3d/547 · .json · Public domain