Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 TC 162 - Peck v. Commissioner

Peck v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
April 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Meier v. Commissioner (1988), Peck v. Commissioner (1990)

2 federal appellate ·

39019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 482

Relies on Montana v. United States · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Amos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Amos v. Commissioner · Evergreens v. Nunan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “three-pronged rubric provided by the Supreme Court in the Montana case embodies a number of detailed tests developed by the courts to test the appropriateness of collateral estoppel in essentially factual contexts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he parties must actually have litigated the issues and the resolution of these issues must have been essential to the prior decision”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Basically, collateral estoppel precludes parties (and their privies) from relitigating issues actually and necessarily litigated and decided in a final prior judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.