Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Tex. 563 - Gates v. Hooper

Gates v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
4
states following
October 1988
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 1988 · most notably 46 Cal. 3d 1147 - State of California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. Texaco (1988), State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co. (1909)

76 state decisions

2701897190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to constitute a trust, within the meaning of the statute, there must be a ‘combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more.’ ‘Combination,’ as here used; means union or association. If there be no union or association by two or more of their ‘capital, skill or acts,’ there can be no ‘combination,’ and hence no ‘trust.’ When we consider the purposes for which the ‘combination’ must .be formed, to come within the statute, the essential meaning of the word ‘combination,’ and the fact that a punishment is prescribed for each day that the trust continues in existence, we are led to the conclusion that the union or association of ‘capital, skill or acts’ denounced is where the parties in the particular case designed the united co-operation of such agencies, which might have been otherwise- independent and competing, for the accomplishment of one or more of such purposes.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.