Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Wash. 2d 432 - State v. Ashbaugh

90 Wash. 2d 432 - State v. Ashbaugh’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Nevers v. Fireside, Inc. (1997), 133 Wash. 2d 804 - Nevers v. Fireside, Inc. (1997)

33 state decisions

1601978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · 76 Wash. 2d 650 - State v. Adams · 12 Wash. App. 654 - Schmitt v. Matthews · 82 Wash. 2d 152 - Myers v. Harris · Stowe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cases ... will not be determined on the basis of compliance or noncompliance with these rules except in compelling circumstances where justice demands”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile a failure to meet jurisdictional requirements has generally mandated dismissal of the appeal, this court has always retained, and occasionally exercised in unusual cases, its authority to nevertheless hear the case on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Such a failure is therefore subject to the alternative rule of RAP 1.2(b) and simply `may result in more severe than usual sanctions.' Typical sanctions are a fine or compensatory award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.