90 Wash. App. 519 - Hern v. Looney’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wash. 2d 402 - Walker v. Munro · 101 Wash. 2d 307 - Miotke v. City of Spokane · 87 Wash. 2d 577 - Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. · 41 Wash. App. 444 - Chapman v. Perera · 65 Wash. App. 703 - In the Matter of Marriage of Greenlee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I don't want to engage in the mini trial of the matter that is pending in another state in this court. And the [Idaho] complaint is before the court, and as I have said, I have noticed it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Klaue v. Hern“it is uncontroverted that Alan Hern is the rightful owner of the one (1) share of stock of Regulus represented by Stock Certificate No. 49 indorsed by Jack Hern”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Klaue v. Hern“limited [mandamus] action here was never intended to adjudicate the validity of Jack Hern's purported gift to Alan Hern.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Klaue v. Hern
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.