90 Wash. App. 54 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 208 W. Va. 432 - State v. Nichols (1999), State v. Cardenas (2002)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Old Chief v. United States · Bellis v. United States · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]xtrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is not admissible unless the witness is afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the same and the opposite party is afforded an opportunity to interrogate the witness thereon ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Johnson's proffered stipulation, along with an appropriate jury instruction, would have proved conclusively that Johnson was a felon.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garcia · State v. Ortega“Evidence likely to provoke an emotional response rather than a rational decision is unfairly prejudicial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.