90 Wash. App. 586 - Milligan v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Smith v. Bates Technical College (2000), 110 Wash. App. 628 - Milligan v. Thompson (2002)
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. · Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U. · Doe ex rel. Doe v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort Wayne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nor was [the plaintiff] required to exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing his tort actions because there is no showing that those claims were initially cognizable by the PAB alone, were within its special expertise, or that the PAB could provide the relief he sought.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) [W]hether the alleged acts involve[d] the same type of discrimination tending to connect them in a continuing violation; (2) whether the alleged acts [were] recurring; and, (3) most importantly, whether the untimely act ha [d] the degree of permanence that should have triggered the employee's awareness of and duty to assert his or her rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where a chain of similar discriminatory acts emanating from the same discriminatory animus exist[ed] and where there ha[d] been some violation within the statute of limitations period that anchor[ed] the earlier claims .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.