90 Wash. App. 638 - Syputa v. Druck, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 657 - Berg v. Hudesman · 123 Wash. 2d 678 - Lynott v. National Union Fire Insurance · US Life Credit Life Ins. v. Williams · 20 Wash. 2d 337 - J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. Pollock · Kingsley Associates, Inc. v. Del-Met, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although [plaintiff] asserts that the parties mutually intended to define the placement of orders as meaning the placement of requirements contracts, the record is devoid of evidence that the parties mutually intended such a definition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“refers to specific products that are listed in the [contract] appendix.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.