90 Wash. App. 863 - Clausing v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “to believe Larkin violated the statutes at issue. Id., 421 U.S. at 55 , 95 S.Ct. at 1468 . And in Washington State Medical Disciplinary Board v. Johnston, 99 Wash.2d 466 , 663 P.2d 457 (1983), our Supreme Court applied Withrow and found no due process violation where a doctor challenged a board's suspension order on prejudgment grounds. There, the board issued an order of summary suspension and the chairman later commented at the revocation hearing the reasons for the summary suspension. The Court held that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Clausing v. State

2. “(1) Evidence, including hearsay evidence, is admissible if in the judgment of the presiding officer it is the kind of evidence on which reasonably prudent persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of their affairs.... (2) If not inconsistent with subsection (1) of this section, the presiding officer shall refer to the Washington Rules of Evidence as guidelines for evidentiary rulings. ... (4) Documentary evidence may be received in the form of copies or excerpts, or by incorporation by reference....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Clausing v. State

3. “An affirmative vote of a simple majority of the members present at a meeting or hearing shall be required for the board to take any official action. The board may not take any action without a quorum of the board members present. A simple majority of the board members currently serving constitutes a quorum of the board.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Clausing v. State