Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Wis. 2d 293 - State v. Mazur

90 Wis. 2d 293 - State v. Mazur’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 117 Wis. 2d 701 - State v. Woods (1984), 190 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Flynn (1994)

29 state decisions

13019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Townsend v. Sain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'application of constitutional principles to the facts as found....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Most certainly the officer had probable cause to believe the chisel was used in the burglary and that it was in the trunk of the car — he had seen it there in the morning. In a sense it was not a search at all but only a seizure of an item the previous search revealed. It was not a prying into concealed areas in such a manner so as to be an unwarranted and unreasonable invasion of privacy. The seizure of the chisel was not so removed from the consent given in the morning either as to time or place to be constitutionally offensive.” 90 Wis. 2d at 303-304 . (Footnote omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.