90 Wis. 2d 357 - Struzik v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2014
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 28 Wis. 2d 412 - Gauthier v. State · 75 Wis. 2d 244 - Klimas v. State · 70 Wis. 2d 22 - Peters v. State · State v. Brodson · Mar Win Development Company v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sentence transparently reveals that the trial court added to the appropriate sentence the time already served, so that the sentence after the application of the credit would still constitute the sentence originally determined.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“first determine an appropriate sentence, then determine the time spent in preconviction custody, and finally credit that time toward the sentence imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armstrong · State v. Fenz“This technique subverts the constitutional right of a convicted prisoner to have time previously served (in circumstances where the time should be credited) applied toward the reduction of an appropriate sentence. This procedure is a clear abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wolfe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.