Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 90 Wis. 2d 58 - State v. Sirisun

90 Wis. 2d 58 - State v. Sirisun’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2022

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

100197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGee v. International Life Insurance · State v. Berry · 75 Wis. 2d 575 - State v. Olson · 69 Cal. 2d 149 - People v. Wrigley · 62 Wis. 2d 577 - State Ex Rel. Hussong v. Froelich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Some liberality must be permitted in this area because of the age of the prosecutrix. A person should not be able to escape punishment for such a . .. crime because he has chosen to take carnal knowledge of an infant too young to testify clearly as to the time and details of such ... activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person should not be able to escape punishment for such a . . . crime because he has chosen to take carnal knowledge of an infant too young to testify clearly as to the time and details of such . . . activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The reviewing court can examine the evidence only sufficiently to discover whether there was any substantial ground for the exercise of judgment by the committing magistrate. When the reviewing court has discovered that there is competent evidence for the judicial mind of the examining magistrate to act on in determining the existence of the essential facts, it has reached the limit of its jurisdiction and cannot go beyond that and weigh the evidence. [Quoting State ex rel. Hussong v. Froelich, 62 Wis. 2d 577, 583 , 215 N.W.2d 390, 394 (1974).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.