Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 A2D 1164 - Calise v. Curtin

Calise v. Curtin’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dembicer v. Pawtucket Cabinet & Builders Finish Co. · State v. Pineda · Tedesco v. Connors · Bergquist v. Cesario · Hefner v. Distel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If during a trial by jury a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue, the court may determine the issue against that party and may grant a motion for judgment as a matter of law against that party with respect to a claim or defense that cannot under the controlling law be maintained or defeated without a favorable finding on that issue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.