Schalk v. Reilly’s Empirical Analysis
900 F.2d 1091 · 1990
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Aigner Corp. (1994), North Shore Gas Company v. Environmental Protection Agency (1991)
31 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (§ 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (§ 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9659 (§ 310 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Block v. Community Nutrition Institute · United States v. Taylor · Arizona v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not be brought with regard to a removal where a remedial action is to be undertaken at the site.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“challenges to the procedure employed in selecting a remedy nevertheless impact the implementation of the remedy and result in the same delays Congress sought to avoid by passage of the statute; the statute necessarily bars these challenges.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o Federal court shall have jurisdiction under Federal law ... to review any challenges to removal or remedial action selected under section 9604 of this title....”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.