Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 F.2d 116 - Richardson v. Penfold

Richardson v. Penfold’s Empirical Analysis

900 F.2d 116 · 1990

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 26 Cal. 4th 572 - Flannery v. Prentice (2001), Hyland v. Wonder (1992)

43 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

330199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Hutto v. Finney · Hanrahan v. Hampton · Hewitt v. Helms · Rhodes v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]echnically, the award of attorney's fees under section 1988 is to the party, not to his lawyer, but it is common to make the award directly to the lawyer where ... the lawyer's contractual entitlement is uncontested.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “once a plaintiff obtains substantive relief that is not defeasible by further proceedings”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is simpler, prompter, and quicker to resolve the issue in the present appeal. Difficulty of envisaging the procedure by which an order sought to be reviewed before the end of the litigation could be reviewed then provides a practical reason for allowing an appeal now.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.