Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 F.2d 213 - Perez v. Simmons

Perez v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis

900 F.2d 213 · 1990

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Castillo (1998), United States v. Jefferson (1991)

55 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

6401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perez v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, if the officers did not have reasonable grounds for believing that Albert resided in the apartment, the search was illegal under Steagald [v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 , 68 L.Ed.2d 38 (1981) ].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Unless a jury finds that the officers had reasonable grounds for believing that Albert was a co-resident of the apartment, and for believing that Albert was in the apartment at the time, see Payton, 445 U.S. at 603 , 100 S.Ct. at 1388 , the search was in violation of Irma Perez’s constitutional rights.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.