Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 F.2d 233 - Bradley v. Veterans Administration

Bradley v. Veterans Administration’s Empirical Analysis

900 F.2d 233 · 1990

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Haebe v. Department of Justice (2002), Jacobs v. Department of Justice (1994)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 5 U.S.C. § 5724 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Ssih Equipment Sa v. United States International Trade Commission · Jackson v. Veterans Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “considering the record as a whole, the agency's evidence is sufficient to be found by a reasonable factfinder to meet the [agency's] evidentiary burden.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established.... it must be enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict when the conclusion sought to be drawn from it is one of fact for the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.