Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

900 F.2d 249

Docket No. 89-7845.

Bright v. Robinson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Feb. 21, 1990. Decided: March 29, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-03-29

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Smith v. Wade · Bailes v. Rd Fisher

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-03-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-77-N)

David Bright, appellant pro se.

Maureen Mullen Dove, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

David Bright appeals from the district court's order denying punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Although the magistrate recommended that punitive damages be awarded against Director Gluckstern, the district court could properly find that Gluckstern was not recklessly or callously indifferent to any federally protected rights. See Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 56 (1983). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Bright v. Robinson, C/A No. 88-77-N (D.Md. Dec. 14, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/900/f2d/249 · .json · Public domain