Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

900 F.2d 252

Docket No. 90-6254.

James v. Wallace

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 5, 1990. Decided March 16, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-03-16

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 1990 · most notably Marion Luther Jackson v. Kitty M. Hawk, Warden (1990), Hemphill v. Housing Authority of the City of Charleston (1990)

28 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1980).

Isiah James, II, appellant pro se.

Carl Norman Lundberg, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Service, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Isiah James, II appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Wallace, C/A No. 89-1980 (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/900/f2d/252 · .json · Public domain