Lemus v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
900 F.3d 15 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2020
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Dada v. Mukasey · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio Yang · VELARDE · Reyes Mata v. Lynch · 16 I. & N. Dec. 653 - GARCIA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only arguably applies to a petitioner's constitutional or legal challenges if they are colorable,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not create a cognizable liberty interest”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gyamfi v. Whitaker · Gomes v. Smith“arbitrary, capricious, [or] an abuse of discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.