Emerson v. Dart’s Empirical Analysis
900 F.3d 469 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Tomanovich v. City of Indianapolis · Mills v. Health Care Service Corp. · Nagle v. Village of Calumet Park · Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To state a retaliation claim under Title VII, 'the plaintiff must prove that he engaged in protected activity and suffered an adverse employment action, and that there is a causal link between the two.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.