Walker v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
900 F.3d 933 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pruitt v. Mote · Perez v. Fenoglio · Santiago v. Walls · Thornton v. Snyder · Bracey v. Grondin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the record contains no evidence upon which the court could have rationally based its decision; (2) the decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law; (3) the decision is based on clearly erroneous factual findings; or (4) the decision clearly appears arbitrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pennewell v. Parish“Not every cognitive limitation will require the district court to recruit a lawyer, but the court should have considered how [plaintiff's] mental health history would affect his ability to think on his feet at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Pennewell v. Parish“has the indigent plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pennewell v. Parish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.