State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · California v. Trombetta · Johnson v. California · State v. Wahlberg · State v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he district court also had to consider potential bias against the State based on [the prospective Juror's] beliefs that in practice the criminal justice system does not work as well as it might and that the United States incarcerates a disproportionate number of African-American men”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“We grant such deference because the existence of racial discrimination in the exercise of a peremptory strike is a factual determination, and the record may not reflect all of the relevant circumstances that the court may consider.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Black“[B]ecause the State accepted one black juror, we conclude that Wilson cannot demonstrate that he has met the required [prima-facie] standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Black
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.