Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 NW2D 373 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · California v. Trombetta · Johnson v. California · State v. Wahlberg · State v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he district court also had to consider potential bias against the State based on [the prospective Juror's] beliefs that in practice the criminal justice system does not work as well as it might and that the United States incarcerates a disproportionate number of African-American men”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We grant such deference because the existence of racial discrimination in the exercise of a peremptory strike is a factual determination, and the record may not reflect all of the relevant circumstances that the court may consider.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[B]ecause the State accepted one black juror, we conclude that Wilson cannot demonstrate that he has met the required [prima-facie] standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.