State v. Stefaniak’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2025
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rimmasch · State v. Workman · State v. Rammel · State v. Iorg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... beyond that which is tainted by ... improper testimony.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Klenz · State v. Burnett“Having determined that the court erred in admitting the testimony bolstering the victim's credibility, we must separately determine whether the error was prejudicial in this case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Peraza · State v. Shepherd“[the State's case against Stefaniak hinged entirely on the credibility of the victim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Klenz · State v. Shepherd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.