State v. LJM’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2015
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Burks v. United States · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Commonwealth v. Bighum · State v. Hoffman · Commonwealth v. Randall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[i]f the Court had even the slightest doubt or there was the slightest shred of evidence or question, as reluctant as I am, I would continue the matter to hear this evidence and bring the jury back. But since there is no such evidence, the motion to dismiss is denied."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. L.J.M. · State v. LJM“fee property is neither a contested nor uncontested fact[, i]t is not a fact at all because it comes from inadmissible hearsay,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. L.J.M. · State v. LJM“as a matter of law that jurisdiction existed because the uncontested facts did not overwhelmingly support jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. LJM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.