People v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2025
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · People v. Czemerynski · United States ex rel. Cross v. DeRobertis · People v. Quintana · Alexander v. McCotter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“willingness to testify (or their amenability to process), and the substance, credibility, or admissibility of their testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Villanueva“substantial evidence which, if introduced, might reasonably have led to a different result,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pendleton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.