900 So. 2d 455 - Ex Parte Rhone’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 814 So. 2d 1008 - Dupaquier v. State · 548 So. 2d 1062 - Cochran v. State · Record Data Intern., Inc. v. Nichols · 351 So. 2d 917 - Walker v. Traughber · Ex Parte Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[l]eave to amend shall be freely granted.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`That statement, however, is not correct. The right to amend is limited by the trial court's discretion to refuse an amendment based upon factors such as undue delay or undue prejudice to the opposing party. That limitation is, in this Court's opinion, sufficient to protect the rights of the parties, while allowing the trial court sufficient control over the management of its docket.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. State · Smith v. State“Such a burden is clearly inconsistent with the mandate of this Court, as expressed in both its decisions and in Rule 32, that leave to amend should be freely granted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.