900 So. 2d 495 - Fitzpatrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
106
cited by 106 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 104 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Neil v. Biggers · Edwards v. Arizona · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, sufficient evidence exists to sustain a conviction.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sanchez v. State · Jones v. State“[e]xclusion of physical evidence that would inevitably have been discovered adds nothing to either the integrity or fairness of a criminal trial.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“accord a presumption of correctness ... to the trial court's determination of historical facts, but [we] independently review mixed questions of law and fact that ultimately determine constitutional issues.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.