¶1Gregory R. Price appeals his conviction for burglary of an occupied dwelling, claiming that defense counsel’s objections during closing argument should have been sustained. We conclude that the closing argument is not materially distinguishable from that involved in De Jesus v. State, 684 So.2d 875, 875-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), and affirm on authority of that case.
¶2Affirmed.