Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

900 So. 2d 778

Hayes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-05-06

Relies on Mora v. Crosby · 764 So. 2d 829 - Hampton v. State · MacIas v. State

Decided 2005-05-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc), review granted, 889 So.2d 72 (Fla.2004). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, *779764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

¶2Affirmed; conflict certified.

FULMER, DAVIS, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
/900/so2d/778 · .json · Public domain