Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 900 S.W.2d 367 - Dean v. State

Dean v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 194th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · Dunn v. State · First Heights Bank, FSB v. Gutierrez · Emery v. State · Corley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the record or any portion thereof is lost or destroyed it may be substituted in the trial court and when so substituted the record may be prepared and transmitted to the appellate court as in other cases. If the appellant has made a timely request for a statement of facts, but the court reporter's notes and records have been lost or destroyed without appellant's fault, the appellant is entitled to a new trial unless the parties agree on a statement of facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.