Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
901 F.2d 1530 · 1990
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 20 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Katz v. Cisneros (1994), Kanemoto v. Reno (1994)
13 federal appellate · 20 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Bowen v. Massachusetts · Hill v. Lockhart · Walgren v. United States · United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party may not circumvent the Claims Court's exclusive jurisdiction by framing a complaint in the district court as one seeking injunctive, declaratory or mandatory relief where the thrust of the suit is to obtain money from the United States.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“test for determining if a case belongs in the Claims Court is whether or not 'the”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of the complaining party is to obtain money from the federal government.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.