Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Quarto Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis
901 F.2d 532 · 1990
Citation profile
112 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Sharondale Corp. v. Ross (1994), Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co. v. Kirk (2001)
112 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 901 · 30 U.S.C. § 932 · 30 U.S.C. § 945
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Hormel v. Helvering · Russ' Kwik Car Wash, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Co. · Old Ben Coal Co. v. Luker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e must affirm the Board's decision if the Board has not committed any legal errors or exceeded its statutory scope of review of the administrative law judge's factual determinations.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We hold ... that where the claimant has failed to receive an election card, that claimant's presentation of that issue or the operator's raising of the transfer liability issue at a formal disability hearing suffices as the legitimate filing of a Part B claim. Id. (emphasis added). 9 87 I therefore cannot agree with the majority that the Quarto court in substance held that a joint motion by a claimant and an operator before an ALJ to transfer liability for the claimant's benefits--and only such a joint motion--is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.