Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

901 F.2d 820

Docket No. 88-6305.

Allen v. Bj Bunnell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 1, 1990.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1990

Relies on Teague v. Lane · Allen v. Hardy · Allen v. Bunnell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

Prior report: 891 F.2d 736.

¶2

Before SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and KING*, District Judge.

ORDER

¶3

The government has filed a "petition for rehearing" calling our attention to the Supreme Court's decision in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1075, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) which appears to apply an even stricter test of retroactivity than that set forth in Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255, 258, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 2879-2880, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). The result in this case would thus be the same under the Teague analysis. The petition for rehearing is denied.

*

The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

/901/f2d/820 · .json · Public domain