Stano v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
901 F.2d 898 · 1990
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Lynn v. United States (2004), Drew v. Department of Corrections (2002)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Townsend v. Sain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the prosecution suppressed evidence; (2) the evidence was favorable to the defendant; and (3) the evidence was material to the issues at trial.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing ... `when his claims are merely conclusory allegations unsupported by specifics or contentions that in the face of the record are wholly incredible.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.