Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 901 F.3d 397 - In re Sealed Case

In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis

901 F.3d 397 · 2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Faretta v. California · Massaro v. United States · 132 S. Ct. 1309 - Martinez v. Ryan · United States v. Andis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “show two things: (1) that counsel's performance was deficient, and (2) that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the defendant has the requisite awareness and understanding of 'the risks involved in his decision.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the record alone conclusively shows that the defendant either is or is not entitled to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.