Johnson v. Odom’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Johnson v. De Grandy · Batson v. Kentucky · Mmahat v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the plaintiff must have been a party to a final judgment in state court judicial proceedings, Johnson v. DeGrandy, 512 U.S. 997 , 114 S.Ct. 2647, 2654 , 129 L.Ed.2d 775 (1994); Johnson v. Odom, 901 F.Supp. 220, 223 (W.D.La.1995). Second, the plaintiffs federal complaint must seek “what in substance would be an appellate review of the state judgment(s) in a United States District Court” Id. (quoting Johnson, 114 S.Ct. at 2654 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Nazu, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.