Coyer v. Hemmer’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Ross v. Bernhard · Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc. · Ratchford v. Gay Lib
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“by making a demand the stockholder `tacitly acknowledges the absence of facts to support a finding of futility.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.